Did you know that the Book of Esther never mentions God?
Did you know that whereas almost every Old Testament book is quoted in the New Testament, the Book of Esther is not?
Did you know that the Dead Sea Scrolls contained copies of every Old Testament book except the Book of Esther? (for more on the Dead Sea Scrolls, see: Why the Dead Sea Scrolls Matter for Christians)
The Book of Esther tells the story of a Jewish girl in Persia who becomes a queen and uses her position to save the Jewish people from an attempted genocide. This story is the basis for the Jewish holiday of Purim, a holiday which is not prescribed in the Law of Moses.
These facts, along with the lack of corresponding historical records which corroborate the events talked about in the book have led many people to question not only whether Esther is historical, but whether it belongs in the Bible at all.
Martin Luther, for example, criticized the Book of Esther, accusing it of being too aggressively nationalistic and containing no gospel content.
It isn’t only Christians who are divided over the Book of Esther; Jewish congregations are also divided over whether Esther is a true story or a fable, and whether it belongs in the canon of Scripture (e.g. the Orthodox Union considers it historical and canonical, whereas the Assembly of True Israel considers it neither historical nor canonical).
Let’s consider the relevant questions:
Is Esther Historical?
The Book of Esther focuses on a ten year period (483-473 B.C.) in the Persian Empire during the reign of Ahasuerus, also known as Xerxes.
The book contains several historical, chronological and cultural details, which would lead us to believe that it is intended to be read as actual history, rather than as a parable. As in the case of Jonah (see: Is Jonah a Historical Account or an Allegory?), specific historical and geographical details are characteristic of historical narratives and not of allegorical stories (e.g. the Good Samaritan or the Prodigal Son).
In Esther 1:1 we read an accurate description of the extent of Xerxes’ empire, in 1:2 we read about the location of the seat of the Persian government, and in 1:3-4, we read that in the third year of his reign, Xerxes gave a banquet for all his officials and servants, including the army of Persia and Media. The reason this is important is that it coincides with the accounts of the historian Herodotus which tell us that Xerxes’ second invasion of Greece took place from 480 to 479 B.C., which means that this great gathering mentioned in Esther 1:3-4, which verse 4 says lasted 180 days, is likely describing the preparation for that military invasion of Greece.
According to Herodotus, Xerxes began his return to Persia after his defeat by the Greek navy at Salamis at the end of 480 B.C. The dismissal of Queen Vashti, described in Esther chapter 1, would correspond to this timeline, having happened just before Xerxes departure to Greece, and his encounter with Esther would have happened just after his return. Herodotus claims that Xerxes “sought consolation in his harem after his defeat at Salamis,” which corresponds with what the Book of Esther describes and the time when Esther would have become queen.
Despite the clear historical setting, no outside sources exist which tell us about Esther becoming queen or about the killing of 75,000 Persians. However, it seems that the author’s intent is to relay historical events, and while corroborating sources do not exist, the same is also true of other historical accounts, including those of Herodotus.
Thus, there doesn’t seem to be any evidence which would lead us to believe that Esther is not a historical account, and where historical accounts from this period do exist, they line up with the historical, cultural and geographical details that Esther gives.
Why is Esther in the Bible if it doesn’t mention God?
Esther was recognized as scripture by the Jews before the time of Christ. Josephus, the Jewish historian, says that the Jewish Scriptures were written from the time of Moses “until Artaxerxes,” whom Josephus identifies as the “Ahasuerus” in the book of Esther (Against Apion 1.40-41 & Jewish Antiquities 11.184). Therefore, Josephus understood Esther to be the last book to be written in the Jewish canon.
In the Christian church, Esther was listed among the books of the Old Testament canon at the Council of Carthage in A.D. 397, but was widely accepted by Christians as canonical long before that because of its inclusion in the Jewish Old Testament canon.
Although God is not named in the book, God is not absent from the story. Like in the story of Joseph, Esther is a story which highlights the providence, or the “invisible hand of God” at work in the world, ordering and ordaining events to happen according to His divine plan.
Many scholars believe that the absence of the word “God” from Esther was not a mistake, but was an intentional literary device, aimed at focusing attention on the importance of human initiative and divine providence. The sheer number of “coincidences” in the Book of Esther beg the reader to take notice of the invisible hand of God at work to bring about salvation and justice.
Does Esther contain any gospel content?
Contrary to Martin Luther’s claim that Esther does not contain any gospel content, the story actually contains very many foreshadowings of the salvation which Jesus will bring. Consider, for example the basic elements of the story:
There is an enemy of the people who wants to kill and destroy them. God raises up a savior at just the right time, who uniquely has access to the throne of the great king, who alone can save the people from this impending doom. This savior, at risk to herself, enters into the throne-room of the king and intercedes on behalf of her people, thus securing their salvation. The evil-doers, who throughout the story seemed to act unencumbered, receive the pronouncement of judgment from the king.
Furthermore, we see how the evil Haman desired to be treated as royalty even though he was not. In this we have a contrast with the one who was indeed royalty, but set aside his privileges in order to become a servant so that He might save us (see Philippians 2:3-11 and Matthew 20:28).
Finally, we see in Esther an example of God’s faithfulness to His covenant people.
Because of the scarcity of historical accounts and the lack of thoroughness of those which exist, it would be unwise for us to assume that this story is not historical just because we have not yet found other accounts which corroborate certain aspects of this story. The fact that some parts of the story do have corroborating historical evidence and accounts should give us confidence that Esther is a historical story about actual events – which ultimately are part of the picture and foreshadowing of the Great Savior who has now come: Jesus Christ, who entered into the throne room of God to make intercession for us, that through Him we might be saved from the great enemies of our souls.
9 thoughts on “Is the Book of Esther Fictional? Does it Really Belong in the Bible?”
Thank you pastor Nick. I just finished Beth Moore’s study of Ester this summer.
She mentioned that even though God isn’t mentioned once , God is all over the pages of that book. Faith during trying government leaders, and conviction of God’s love were very helpful to me. All found in the book of Ester!!
That’s great to hear!
What’s your take on the way the book is written like a book of fiction? There are elements of fiction in Ester such as foreshadowing, dramatic scenes, a hero, a villain, superfluous synonyms, repetition, interwoven themes, and the ultimate irony of the villain hanging himself on the gallows he had built for his own enemy.
I think it’s similar to the book of Jonah in that it is not history written for history’s sake, but it is written using many literary devices for didactic purposes. Furthermore, this story – according to the Mishnah – was to be read aloud at the beginning of the celebration of Purim. Thus, the melodramatic way the story is written makes it more interesting to listen to. Interestingly, Jonah was also to be read aloud as the people stood, and then together they would respond “We are Jonah.”
I don’t think this is actually very different from how much of the Bible is written: it is not history for history’s sake (with the exceptions of some sections). It is history which is for the purpose of making very important spiritual and practical points and lessons.
As far as the villain hanging himself on the gallows he built for his enemy, this is a major intercanonical theme: that in God’s divine providence, those who attack the people of God are done in by their own devices. For example: Joseph, whose brothers meant evil against him, but in a great ironic twist, that evil ends up being the very means by which they are saved and God’s purposes are accomplished.
It is true that God is not mentioned at all in the book of Esther, But then again it is. In these verses: God’s name is hidden: 1;20 + 5;4 + 5,13 + 7; 5 + 7;7 It is there in Acrostic form. When a statement is made by Mordecai (who is a symbol of the Holy Spirit) God’s name is found as the first letter of the first few words of the scripture. When Haman (the symbol of the flesh) is talking the word GOD is spelled backwards in the first few words of the line. This applies only to the original scripture. But as someone mentioned before. God’s print is in every verse of the book. And even it isn’t referenced in the New Testament. Esthers book is the ONLY PLACE in the Bible where the Renewing of the Mind is explained thoroughly. Actually it is a 10 day course 1½ hour per day if you would want to get all the information.
Listen to this and you’ll understand the story about Esther. It has everything to do with God and the garden of eden story.
If the book was true, Esther’s father would have had to be about 135 years old according to the accounts given in the book……Not possible The bible actually proves itself, and discards the book of Esther, which I believe was probably written in the era of the 3rd century AD… its another Apocrypha ficton book…..Its not a biblical book, and neither is the song of Solomon…
I also like the way it says the king’s wrath was apeased when Haman was hanged on the gallows just like God’s wrath was appeased when Jesus was hanged on the cross for our sins.